{"title":"Legal History","description":"\u003cp\u003eLegal history traces the evolution of laws, judicial systems, and legal institutions from antiquity to the present. This subject investigates pivotal developments, landmark cases, influential legal thinkers, and the sociopolitical contexts that have shaped legal doctrines and practices over centuries. Studying legal history reveals how shifting cultural, economic, and political forces impact the rules that govern societies.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eReaders seeking to contextualize current laws or compare legal systems benefit from focusing on historical legal texts. This category differs from general law studies by centering on the origins and transformations of legal concepts, rather than on practical application or current statutes. For deeper analysis, narrowing to particular periods, countries, or thematic case studies sheds light on specific legal traditions and their ongoing influence.\u003c\/p\u003e","products":[{"product_id":"religion-trial-handbook-cases-laws-documents-9781851094912-new","title":"Religion on Trial: A Handbook with Cases, Laws, and Documents","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eFrom colonial times to the present, an insightful examination of how courts have determined the extent to which religion is accommodated in American public life.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFrom the internationally renowned Scopes \"Monkey Trial\" of 1925, which pitted a public school teacher arrested for teaching evolution against the state of Tennessee, \u003ci\u003eReligion on Trial\u003c\/i\u003e chronicles key court cases that have shaped the tumultuous relationship between church and state throughout U.S. history. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThis volume chronicles such groundbreaking cases as the 1991 decision ordering blood transfusions for children of Christian Scientists in \u003ci\u003eNorwood Hospital v. Munoz\u003c\/i\u003e and the infamous case, \u003ci\u003eEngel v. Vitale\u003c\/i\u003e, that banned prayer in schools and ignited calls for Chief Justice Earl Warren's impeachment. The work addresses such inflammatory contemporary disputes as prayer in schools, allegiance to the flag, and the display of religious symbols on public property, and the impact they have had on American society.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"ABC CLIO","offers":[{"title":"New","offer_id":51545586565410,"sku":"9781851094912-new","price":79.73,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0893\/4755\/5618\/files\/9781851094912.jpg?v=1776424766"},{"product_id":"not-sale-kelo-v-new-london-modern-debate-over-eminent-domain-9780700641543-new","title":"Not for Sale: Kelo V. New London and the Modern Debate Over Eminent Domain","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eThe dramatic story of how a small neighborhood in Connecticut became the site and symbol of a political conflict over the use of eminent domain, mobilizing a national property rights movement.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn 2000, Susette Kelo and other residents of the Fort Trumbull neighborhood sued the city of New London, Connecticut. Two years earlier, the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer had built a facility adjacent to this area. Shortly thereafter, the city empowered the privately owned New London Development Corporation to use the power of eminent domain to implement a \"comprehensive redevelopment plan\" for the neighborhood. While the plaintiffs argued that economic development did not qualify as a valid \"public use\" under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, the Supreme Court decided in a controversial 2005 decision that the potential economic benefits of the plan justified the condemnation of private property as long as appropriate compensation was paid.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe \u003ci\u003eKelo\u003c\/i\u003e decision implied that any town could transfer property to private developers on the grounds of possible future tax revenue and job creation, so long as that action was included in an economic development plan. The outrage over the decision unleashed a near-unanimous backlash, even resulting in an executive order from President George W. Bush instructing the federal government to limit the use of eminent domain. Numerous states passed ballot initiatives and legislation restricting eminent domain in the wake of the \u003ci\u003eKelo\u003c\/i\u003e case. Despite this outcry, urban planners and others defended it as a necessary application of existing precedent that allowed cities flexibility to combat economic downturns. Lead plaintiff Susette Kelo and her pink house became a symbol of a growing national property rights movement and a deepening conflict between public officials and property owners, between large corporations and local communities. Perhaps most disastrously, after bulldozing the neighborhood the developer was unable to secure the necessary financing and abandoned the project, leaving empty lots where the plaintiffs' properties once stood. It would be many years before a feasible plan led to actual new construction and improvements.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eNot for Sale\u003c\/i\u003e recounts this iconic episode in recent legal history, giving full attention to both the human and legal elements of the story and offering a balanced consideration of each. The story remains as relevant as ever, especially since the Supreme Court has repeatedly refused to reconsider its decision, most recently in \u003ci\u003eBowers Development, LLC v. Oneida County Industrial Development Agency\u003c\/i\u003e (2025).\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"UNIV PR OF KANSAS","offers":[{"title":"New","offer_id":51566145470754,"sku":"9780700641543-new","price":33.15,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0893\/4755\/5618\/files\/9780700641543.jpg?v=1777010775"},{"product_id":"not-sale-kelo-v-new-london-modern-debate-over-eminent-domain-9780700641536-new","title":"Not for Sale: Kelo V. New London and the Modern Debate Over Eminent Domain","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eThe dramatic story of how a small neighborhood in Connecticut became the site and symbol of a political conflict over the use of eminent domain, mobilizing a national property rights movement.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIn 2000, Susette Kelo and other residents of the Fort Trumbull neighborhood sued the city of New London, Connecticut. Two years earlier, the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer had built a facility adjacent to this area. Shortly thereafter, the city empowered the privately owned New London Development Corporation to use the power of eminent domain to implement a \"comprehensive redevelopment plan\" for the neighborhood. While the plaintiffs argued that economic development did not qualify as a valid \"public use\" under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, the Supreme Court decided in a controversial 2005 decision that the potential economic benefits of the plan justified the condemnation of private property as long as appropriate compensation was paid.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe \u003ci\u003eKelo\u003c\/i\u003e decision implied that any town could transfer property to private developers on the grounds of possible future tax revenue and job creation, so long as that action was included in an economic development plan. The outrage over the decision unleashed a near-unanimous backlash, even resulting in an executive order from President George W. Bush instructing the federal government to limit the use of eminent domain. Numerous states passed ballot initiatives and legislation restricting eminent domain in the wake of the \u003ci\u003eKelo\u003c\/i\u003e case. Despite this outcry, urban planners and others defended it as a necessary application of existing precedent that allowed cities flexibility to combat economic downturns. Lead plaintiff Susette Kelo and her pink house became a symbol of a growing national property rights movement and a deepening conflict between public officials and property owners, between large corporations and local communities. Perhaps most disastrously, after bulldozing the neighborhood the developer was unable to secure the necessary financing and abandoned the project, leaving empty lots where the plaintiffs' properties once stood. It would be many years before a feasible plan led to actual new construction and improvements.\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eNot for Sale\u003c\/i\u003e recounts this iconic episode in recent legal history, giving full attention to both the human and legal elements of the story and offering a balanced consideration of each. The story remains as relevant as ever, especially since the Supreme Court has repeatedly refused to reconsider its decision, most recently in \u003ci\u003eBowers Development, LLC v. Oneida County Industrial Development Agency\u003c\/i\u003e (2025).\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"UNIV PR OF KANSAS","offers":[{"title":"New","offer_id":51566145503522,"sku":"9780700641536-new","price":116.66,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0893\/4755\/5618\/files\/9780700641536.jpg?v=1777010775"},{"product_id":"five-bullets-story-bernie-goetz-new-yorks-explosive-80s-subway-vigilante-trial-that-divided-nation-9780593833704-new","title":"Five Bullets: The Story of Bernie Goetz, New York's Explosive '80s, and the Subway Vigilante Trial That Divided the Nation","description":"\u003cb\u003e\"Read this book to understand human nature.\" (Preet Bharara) - \"An amazing story, well told.\" (Anderson Cooper) - \"A masterful telling.\" (Dahlia Lithwick)\u003ci\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/i\u003e\u003cbr\u003eFrom CNN legal analyst Elliot Williams, a revelatory account of how one man, four teenagers, and a struggling city collided over race, vigilantism, and public safety . . . exposing the fault lines of a nation\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eOn a dirty New York subway car on December 22, 1984, Bernhard Goetz shot Barry Allen, Darrell Cabey, Troy Canty, and James Ramseur, four teenagers from the Bronx, at point blank range. Goetz claimed they were going to mug him; the teens claim that one of them had simply asked for five dollars. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eCrime was at an all-time high. So was racial tension. Was Goetz, who was white, a hero who finally fought back? Or a bigot whose itchy trigger finger seriously wounded three unarmed black kids and condemned a fourth to irreversible brain damage? By the time Goetz went on trial for quadruple attempted murder, the \"Subway Vigilante\" saga had become a global sensation, and New Yorkers across race and class were split over whether he deserved decades in prison...or a medal. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eIn \u003ci\u003eFive Bullets\u003c\/i\u003e, Elliot Williams vaults back to gritty 1980s Manhattan and reexamines the first major true-crime story of the cable news era. Drawing on archives and interviews with many main characters, including Goetz, Williams presents a masterful and vivid tale that also tells the origin stories of larger-than-life figures: Al Sharpton, a polarizing young local activist rocketing to national prominence; Rudy Giuliani, a rising-star prosecutor with an important decision to make; the NRA, which needed a poster boy for its transition from hunting club to political juggernaut; and Rupert Murdoch, whose new purchase, the \u003ci\u003eNew York Post\u003c\/i\u003e, grew his empire by keeping a scary story in the headlines. \u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003eA shocking account of a pivotal moment in our history, \u003ci\u003eFive Bullets\u003c\/i\u003e demonstrates why, in order to understand today's debates about race, crime, safety, and the media, it's imperative to reflect on what went down in the subway four decades ago. As Williams's powerful narrative reveals, it was not just Goetz on trial, but the conscience of a nation.","brand":"PENGUIN PR","offers":[{"title":"New","offer_id":51578655605026,"sku":"9780593833704-new","price":25.14,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0893\/4755\/5618\/files\/9780593833704.jpg?v=1777410986"}],"url":"https:\/\/www.albakireads.com\/collections\/law-legal-history.oembed","provider":"AlbakiReads","version":"1.0","type":"link"}